A newborn’s first hours in a US hospital used to carry a quiet set of guarantees. A vitamin K injection against catastrophic bleeding. A hepatitis B vaccination. The assumption that whatever a family could afford, the country had already decided this child was worth protecting. I have spent more than 40 years in pulmonary and critical care medicine. I have seen children harmed by disease, poverty, by bad luck. I had not, until now, seen them harmed so methodically by their own government.
Read the headlines one at a time and the pattern disappears. A vaccine rule one week, a food program the next, the reorganization of an agency most people could not name. Each change arrives wrapped in a reasonable rationale: fiscal discipline, local control, parental choice. But arrange them in the order a child actually grows, and the rationales stop mattering. What you see instead is a sequence.
It starts at birth. Under the health secretary, Robert F Kennedy Jr, the routine childhood immunization schedule has been narrowed from 17 diseases to 11, and the hepatitis B birth dose is among the casualties.
Read more:Lil Nas X shares a video update after getting mental health care: ‘There’s less fear in my heart’
Let me translate that from policy back into medicine. A hepatitis B infection caught in infancy turns chronic in roughly nine of 10 cases; in adults it is closer to one in 20.
Chronic infection is what produces cirrhosis and liver cancer three and four decades later. The harm hides for most of a lifetime, which is the entire reason we vaccinate on the first day. Refusals of the vitamin K shot, which is not a vaccine but the one thing that keeps a newborn from bleeding into its own brain, nearly doubled between 2017 and 2024 in an analysis of more than 5m births. We are bringing back diseases that medicine spent a century learning to stop.
Move forward a year or two, and the child meets the next subtraction. The administration’s budget would cut WIC’s fruit-and-vegetable benefit for small children by as much as three-quarters, from $26 a month to $10. Head Start, which reaches more than half a million of the poorest preschoolers in the country, was marked first for elimination and then for a freeze; its federal staff cut by about a fifth.
By school age, the child may well be one of the nearly four in 10 American children insured through Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program. Two million fewer children are enrolled now than when the president took office, by Georgetown University’s count; the federal government’s own slower data already concedes a drop of at least 1.5 million.
The deepest cuts have not yet landed. In the same months, the largest reduction to food stamps in the program’s 60-year history began pushing 4 million people off the rolls, many of them parents. The locally grown produce that the agriculture department had been buying for school cafeterias, a billion-dollar program, was cancelled outright last year. It “no longer effectuate[s] the goals of the agency”, the department explained.
Read more:Argentina star Lionel Messi’s father Jorge has health issue, family confirm
And the child with a disability? On Tuesday, while I was drafting this, the administration announced it would move oversight of the law that guarantees 7.5 million such children an education, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, to the Department of Health and Human Services, and shift the Office for Civil Rights, which investigates discrimination against them, to the Department of Justice. No one has explained how this helps a single child. It satisfies a campaign promise to abolish the Department of Education. That is the whole thing.
Alongside the cuts, the administration is doing something quieter. It is switching off the instruments that would register the harm. States no longer have to report whether children on Medicaid have been immunized. Vitamin K refusals were never counted federally to begin with. No official will say how many children are expected to lose coverage.
Any clinician knows that silencing the monitor does not stabilize the patient. It only ensures that no one hears the alarm. A government that did not expect to find damage would not work this hard to avoid looking for it.
Read more:Why America is failing its health report card | Robert B Shpiner | The Guardian
The answer from the administration is that this is what voters wanted, and that Washington has no business in a child’s breakfast. You can argue against any single one of these decisions on its merits. What no argument accounts for is the consistency of who pays. And the sequence is still running.
Last week, Kennedy asked a federal appeals court to fast-track its review of the March ruling that had frozen his vaccine changes, after a judge found 13 of his 15 new advisers unqualified to sit on the panel and the changes themselves arbitrary and capricious. He wants the reconstituted committee acting before the autumn respiratory season.
Read more:Ivory Coast says Elye Wahi’s Canada visa cleared for next World Cup match
I began this work as a young physician in Los Angeles in the early 1980s, when a new disease was killing young men and much of the country had decided it would rather not look. The lesson of those years was plain and brutal. The cost of looking away is paid in lives, and it is paid later, by the people least able to absorb it. We are looking away again.
This time the patients are children, and this time it is by design. You can measure a society by what it promises a newborn it will never meet. We are taking the promise back, one program at a time.
