FIFA‘s removal of the senior official who said Gianni Infantino deceived staff with his World Cup sell-off plan was unacceptable, Norway FA president Lise Klaveness said on Tuesday while urging other leaders at the governing body to resist potentially damaging orders.
The firing of FIFA chief operating officer Kevin Lamour late Monday came 17 days after his statement to the Associated Press criticising Infantino’s $20 billion private equity project that helped to end it hours later.
“Now he is thrown out and we are supposed to move on. It’s unacceptable, it’s management by fear,” Klaveness told the AP in a telephone interview, describing Lamour as “the best football administrator I have ever met.”
“Now we also have to call upon FIFA leadership and the administration to not submit to orders you know are not in the interests of football,” Klaveness added, especially targeting FIFA secretary general Mattias Grafström.
Read more:FIFA executive Kevin Lamour departs amid backlash over Infantino’s World Cup sale plan
She is a former Norway international player, a judge in Oslo and an elected executive committee member at European football body UEFA who has built on her country’s long-held reputation as a champion of good governance in football.
Lamour was a long-time colleague of Infantino, first as senior officials at UEFA from 2007-15, on his campaign team to be elected FIFA president in 2016, then moving two years ago from UEFA to oversee much of FIFA’s operations in Zurich.
Infantino in crisis With a reputation among the most trusted executives in the often murky world of global soccer politics, Lamour’s pointed criticisms of Infantino’s leadership intensified a crisis for the FIFA president.
Read more:Scotland FA latest to withdraw support for FIFA’s Gianni Infantino
A backlash by UEFA, the Asian Football Confederation and north American soccer body Concacaf was provoked by a secretive plan to sell future World Cup profits to investors led by Joshua Kushner.
A $4.2 billion investment to take a 20% stake in a FIFA commercial spin-off was to fund offers of $20 million to each of its 211 national member federations. They already effectively own the non-profit football body, which has multibillion dollar reserves, and would have had a mid-September deadline to accept.
Lamour’s statement on July 31 spoke of FIFA staff being “deceived” by Infantino’s lack of openness over the now-failed sale and how they “deserve better than contempt and intimidation.”
The French executive called on soccer leaders worldwide “to make the right decisions” and signed off: “If that means I lose my job, then so be it. I will understand and respect that decision. At least I’ll sleep well tonight.”
Read more:Live animals and baking bread feature in Messiaen’s `Saint François d’Assise’ at Salzburg Festival
Fired, not resigned “This is a firing situation, it’s not a resignation,” Klaveness said of Lamour’s exit, suggesting it was done by Grafström “obviously being pressured by the president.”
In a statement, FIFA said it “thanks Kevin for his two years of service and wishes him the best of luck for the future.”
“His statement was necessary to kill the project,” Klaveness said of Lamour’s intervention. “He said something that was obvious, that was very important that someone within the staff told us the story so that we knew it was not FIFA, as such, but one person.”
Read more:LaLiga chief Javier Tebas calls for change at FIFA: ‘Infantino era is over’
Infantino called a meeting with senior management minus Lamour in Rabat, Morocco. After that Aug. 5 meeting, a FIFA statement apologized for errors and said those managers who attended “reaffirmed their full support” of Infantino’s presidency.
“We all got reports in Morocco, we know it’s a management of fear,” Klaveness said. “It’s not in football’s best interests.”
Until the uproar over Infantino’s “FIFA Forward Enterprise” proposal, he seemed sure to be reelected unopposed next year in Morocco. The deadline is Nov. 18 for challengers to enter the contest.
