When the immigration minister, Tony Burke, approached the National Press Club podium on Thursday, the eyes of every migrant in the country would have been fixed on him. But, in fact, Burke’s address was a message for all working people across the country – and a signal of the times ahead for all of us.
The past 12 months have seen all sides of politics cohere around the consensus articulated in the introduction to Burke’s address by the press club’s president, Tom Connell: “there is furious agreement over a need for a cut to immigration.” The only difference across the political spectrum is in the detail: who deserves to be cut, and who is valuable or otherwise deserving enough to remain.
In fact, judging by the tenor of current debate, it would be easy to think that immigration is the onlyeconomic lever available to the government to address housing affordability, falling wages and cost-of-living pressures. To test that theory, consider whether, over a Sunday lunch, your uncle is more likely to proffer an opinion on tax settings driving housing speculation, the corporate supermarket duopoly or immigration levels? There is an attractively simple supply-and-demand logic underlying the assumption that fewer people will automatically mean more to go around.
But migrants didn’t design – and then implement over 20 years – the tax breaks that transformed housing into an asset, allowing investors to drive up prices and control distribution through property hoarding. And it wasn’t migrants, sitting in state and federal legislatures, who chose to wind back investment in public housing that previous generations had benefited from.
Migrants didn’t mastermind the attacks on collective bargaining that have seen union membership and real wages plummet over the past two decades. And they didn’t invent the supermarket duopoly or dictate the eye-watering profits that Coles and Woolworths maintain, driving up grocery prices while wages remain stagnant.
Read more:What does Racing Louisville’s NWSL future look like — and does the club even have one?
But as long as public debate remains fixated on immigration numbers, the bigger policy questions that could actually transform the lives of working people will remain unanswered. And there will be an endless, self-fulfilling cycle of blame targeting our friends, neighbours and co-workers born overseas for problems not of their making.
Burke set the scene for future blame-shifting. Design features of our migration program are ascribed to temporary migrants as a kind of collective moral failing. For decades, governments have re-geared the migration system towards temporary migration and shifted the goalposts on permanent residency. The natural result of this – that people transition between temporary visas to realise their hopes of permanent migration – has been recast as an illegitimate form of “visa-hopping”.
International students and graduates will no longer be able to migrate with their partners and children because, according to Burke, they should not receive special treatment compared with permanent residents and citizens forced to wait years for family reunion. But family visa processing blowouts are the direct result of ministerial directions that deprioritise and slow down some applications.
Read more:Kylian Mbappé explains obscuring Ceuta shirt amid backlash
The path has been cleared for more “comprehensive” measures to come, when political and economic pressures demand them. The government has repeatedly floated the idea of legislating a 30-day window on asylum applications, requiring new migrants to make a claim immediately or miss out. This would, of course, force people seeking asylum who have missed the eligibility window to remain in the community without a visa, exposing them either to destitution, exploitative work in the cash economy or being rounded up in immigration raids.
As tempting as it might be to blame grievance politics, far-right organising or the electoral rise of One Nation for the current impasse, these are just symptoms of a much deeper malaise. It will always be in the interests of our political leaders and their backers to deflect blame for economic conditions away from themselves and on to people who cannot speak back at the ballot box.
Read more:Dementia: How might biological aging speed affect risk?
By continuing to allow immigration to be the scapegoat for economic grievance, we not only abandon refugees and migrants to endless cycles of blame – we abandon working people to the very conditions that produced the grievances in the first place.
